Pakistan a VICTIM of terrorism - oh really!

Pakistan is trying to bail itself out by claiming that it is a victim of terrorism and not the cause. Can this be believed? Aren't they the ones who brought into existence these terrorist groups to wage a proxy war on India. And now when their friends have becomes their foes, why are they shedding crocodile tears. All this news about they capturing LeT biggies is a farce. It is only to silence the countries putting pressure on Pakistan to catch the culprits on the Mumbai attacks. Pakistan will never ever take any real action on them. They were allowed to do their unlawful activities freefly until now, in future they'll operate from jails or hide-outs.

Source of weapons for these terrorists

Indians are contemplating the role of Pakistan in this event. We are trying to establish the link between the Pak operative LeT and the Mumbai attacks. What I keep wondering is from where do these organizations get their ammunitions? We all know that USA is aiding Pakistan presently for its fight against terrorism and Taliban. But USA has supported Pakistan since ever (post cold war). It is an established fact that the armaments used by Pakistan during all the wars with India were directly acquired from the US without having to pay a single penny, and much of that was done secretly (until now). So is Pakistan using the same weaponry in its proxy war against India. Who is the source of this weaponry? Because the source is the actual culprit. I am sure that these terrorist do not use home grown weapons, they buy it from open markets of weapons. So who is providing them weapons. From where does Pakistan get so much weapons for these terrorists?

Role of Media is being terrorist aids

During the three day operation from 26 - 29 Nov, we saw the electronic and visual media providing all the latest and upto date information to its audiences. We saw them discussing the strategies being adopted by the authorities to contain the attack, the actions taken by the commandos, the trauma of the hostages while they were actually trapped, etc. How do we justify this? Was media involved and responsible for providing all the information that terrorists needed to be able to stretch the operation for 3 days and kill more than 200 people? Is it justified for the media to give such a wide coverage to a classified event?